| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
U-Boot environment variables can be stored in various data sources. MTD
is just one of available options. Refactor DT binding into a layout so
it can be used with UBI volumes and other NVMEM devices.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231221173421.13737-1-zajec5@gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240902142952.71639-4-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
There's no reason to have a nested if/then schema as checking for compatible
being present and containing 'mac-base' can all be done in one 'if' schema.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240224114516.86365-2-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/char-misc
Pull char/misc driver updates from Greg KH:
"Here is the big set of char/misc and other small driver subsystem
changes for 6.6-rc1.
Stuff all over the place here, lots of driver updates and changes and
new additions. Short summary is:
- new IIO drivers and updates
- Interconnect driver updates
- fpga driver updates and additions
- fsi driver updates
- mei driver updates
- coresight driver updates
- nvmem driver updates
- counter driver updates
- lots of smaller misc and char driver updates and additions
All of these have been in linux-next for a long time with no reported
problems"
* tag 'char-misc-6.6-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/char-misc: (267 commits)
nvmem: core: Notify when a new layout is registered
nvmem: core: Do not open-code existing functions
nvmem: core: Return NULL when no nvmem layout is found
nvmem: core: Create all cells before adding the nvmem device
nvmem: u-boot-env:: Replace zero-length array with DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() helper
nvmem: sec-qfprom: Add Qualcomm secure QFPROM support
dt-bindings: nvmem: sec-qfprom: Add bindings for secure qfprom
dt-bindings: nvmem: Add compatible for QCM2290
nvmem: Kconfig: Fix typo "drive" -> "driver"
nvmem: Explicitly include correct DT includes
nvmem: add new NXP QorIQ eFuse driver
dt-bindings: nvmem: Add t1023-sfp efuse support
dt-bindings: nvmem: qfprom: Add compatible for MSM8226
nvmem: uniphier: Use devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource()
nvmem: qfprom: do some cleanup
nvmem: stm32-romem: Use devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource()
nvmem: rockchip-efuse: Use devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource()
nvmem: meson-mx-efuse: Convert to devm_platform_ioremap_resource()
nvmem: lpc18xx_otp: Convert to devm_platform_ioremap_resource()
nvmem: brcm_nvram: Use devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource()
...
|
|
A lot of home routers have NVMEM fixed cells containing MAC address that
need some further processing. In ~99% cases MAC needs to be:
1. Optionally parsed from ASCII format
2. Increased by a vendor-picked value
There was already an attempt to design a binding for that at NVMEM
device level in the past. It wasn't accepted though as it didn't really
fit NVMEM device layer.
The introduction of NVMEM fixed-cells layout seems to be an opportunity
to provide a relevant binding in a clean way.
This commit adds a *generic* compatible string: "mac-base". As always it
needs to be carefully reviewed.
OpenWrt project currently supports ~300 home routers that have NVMEM
cell with binary-stored base MAC.T hose devices are manufactured by
multiple vendors. There are TP-Link devices (76 of them), Netgear (19),
D-Link (11), OpenMesh (9), EnGenius (8), GL.iNet (8), ZTE (7),
Xiaomi (5), Ubiquiti (6) and more. Those devices don't share an
architecture or SoC.
Another 200 devices have base MAC stored in an ASCII format (not all
those devices have been converted to DT though).
It would be impractical to provide unique "compatible" strings for NVMEM
layouts of all those devices. It seems like a valid case for allowing a
generic binding instead. Even if this binding will not be sufficient for
some further devices it seems to be useful enough as it is.
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230823132744.350618-2-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Fix typos in Documentation/devicetree/bindings. The changes are in
descriptions or comments where they shouldn't affect functionality.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230814212822.193684-3-helgaas@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
|
|
With the introduction of NVMEM layouts, new NVMEM content structures
should be defined as such. We should also try to convert / migrate
existing NVMEM content bindings to layouts.
This commit handles fixed NVMEM cells. So far they had to be defined
directly - as device subnodes. With this change it's allowed to put them
in the DT node named "nvmem-layout".
Having NVMEM cells in separated node is preferred as it draws a nice
line between NVMEM device and its content. It results in cleaner
bindings.
FWIW a very similar situation has happened to MTD devices and their
partitions: see commit 5d96ea42eb63 ("dt-bindings: mtd: Clarify all
partition subnodes").
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20230611140330.154222-24-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
There is a spelling mistake in platforn-name. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230404172148.82422-7-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Add a schema for the ONIE tlv NVMEM layout that can be found on any ONIE
compatible networking device.
Describe all the possible NVMEM cells that can be produced by this
layout parser.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118063932.6418-14-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Add a schema for the NVMEM layout on Kontron's sl28 boards.
Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118063932.6418-12-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
The nvmem devices description works like this:
* Most cases (EEPROM & co):
eeprom@x {
compatible = "<eeprom-compatible>";
...
};
* MTD case:
flash@y {
compatible = "<flash-compatible>";
...
otp {
compatible = "user-otp"; /* or "factory-otp" */
...
};
};
In the former case, the nvmem device is "eeprom@x", while in the latter
case the nvmem device is "otp".
Nvmem devices can produce nvmem cells. The current way to describe nvmem
cells is to locate them by providing their static byte and bit offset
and length. These information are stored in subnodes of the nvmem
device.
It is now a fact that such description does not fit more advanced use
cases where the location or the size of the cells may vary. There are
currently three known situations which require being described
differently: Kontron's SL28 VPD, ONIE's TLV table and U-Boot's
environment variables.
Hence, we need a way to describe the parsers that must be used in order
to make the dynamic discovery of the nvmem cells. This new description
must fit both use cases (the generic situation and the MTD case).
Let's create in both cases a container node named nvmem-layout whose
content will depend on the parser. Right now nvmem-layout.yaml is
"empty", but references to additional layout parser bindings will be
inserted in the near future. The final goal being something that looks
like:
* Most cases (EEPROM & co):
eeprom@x {
compatible = "<eeprom-compatible>";
...
nvmem-layout {
compatible = "<parser-compatible>";
...
};
};
* MTD case:
flash@y {
compatible = "<flash-compatible>";
...
otp {
compatible = "user-otp"; /* or "factory-otp" */
...
nvmem-layout {
compatible = "<parser-compatible>";
...
};
};
};
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118063932.6418-10-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
