Add a separate range classes for internal usage (#12071)

Summary:
Introduce some different range classes `UserKeyRange` and `UserKeyRangePtr` to be used by internal implementation. The `Range` class is used in both public APIs like `DB::GetApproximateSizes`, `DB::GetApproximateMemTableStats`, `DB::GetPropertiesOfTablesInRange` etc and internal implementations like `ColumnFamilyData::RangesOverlapWithMemtables`, `VersionSet::GetPropertiesOfTablesInRange`.

These APIs have different expectations of what keys this range class contain.  Public API users are supposed to populate the range with the user keys without timestamp, in the same way that point lookup and range scan APIs' key input only expect the user key without timestamp. The internal APIs implementation expect a user key whose format is compatible with the user comparator, a.k.a a user key with the timestamp.

This PR contains:
1) introducing counterpart range class `UserKeyRange` `UserKeyRangePtr` for internal implementation while leave the existing `Range` and `RangePtr` class only for public APIs. Internal implementations are updated to use this new class instead.
2) add user-defined timestamp support for `DB::GetPropertiesOfTablesInRange` API and `DeleteFilesInRanges` API.

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/12071

Test Plan:
existing tests
Added test for `DB::GetPropertiesOfTablesInRange` and `DeleteFilesInRanges` APIs for when user-defined timestamp is enabled.
The change in external_file_ingestion_job doesn't have a user-defined timestamp enabled test case coverage, will add one in a follow up PR that adds file ingestion support for UDT.

Reviewed By: ltamasi

Differential Revision: D53292608

Pulled By: jowlyzhang

fbshipit-source-id: 9a9279e23c640a6d8f8232636501a95aef7638b8

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions